Concrete Homes Stand Up to
Earthquakes*
In reinforced concrete construction, the combination of concrete and steel provides the three most
important properties for earthquake resistance: stiffness, strength, and ductility.
Why Buildings Survive
Scientists study damage from earthquakes to determine what types of buildings best withstand seismic forces. Modern
earthquake-resistant design relies on several studies including:
| Year |
Earthquake |
Magnitude |
Studies |
| 1989 |
Loma Prieta |
7.1
|
Univ. of CA Berkeley |
| 1994 |
Northridge |
6.8
|
NAHB Research Center/ National Institute of Standards and Technology |
| 2000 |
Yountville/Napa
|
5.2
|
Stanford University |
Studies of earthquake damage consistently show well-anchored shear walls are the key to earthquake resistance in low-rise
buildings.
Optimal design conditions include shear walls that extend the entire height and located on all four sides of a building. Long
walls are stronger than short walls, and solid walls are better than ones with a lot of opening for windows and doors. These elements are
designed to survive severe sideways (in-plane) forces, called racking and shear, without being damaged or bent far out of position. Shear
walls also must be well anchored to the foundation structure to work effectively. Properly installed steel reinforcing bars extend across
the joint between the walls and the foundation to provide secure anchorage to the foundation.
Why Buildings Fail
Low-rise buildings most vulnerable to earthquakes do have the necessary stiffness, strength, and ductility to resist the forces of
an earthquake or had walls that were not well anchored to a solid foundation, or both. Three types of buildings sustained the most
significant damage:
 |
Multi-story buildings with a ground floor consisting only of
columns:
Most of these buildings were 3 to 4 stories tall with a parking garage or a living area with many large windows on the ground
level. The columns may have been strong enough to hold up the structure, but did not provide an adequate amount of racking
resistance during a seismic event. When the earthquake shook the building side-to-side, the upper stories sometimes tipped over
to one side. Whether built of wood, steel, or concrete—they all suffered damage.
|
|
|
Wood-frame houses with weak connections between the walls and
foundation:
Wood-framed buildings are inherently ductile (flexible), which is an attribute during an earthquake. However, the shaking sent
some of these houses sliding to one side. Frequently, the shear walls were strong enough, but the connection to the foundation
was a weak point that gave way.
|
 |
|
 |
Why reinforced concrete is safe
Reinforced concrete walls are a composite system: Concrete resists compression forces, and reinforcing steel resists tensile forces
produced by an earthquake. |
|
The concrete is cast around the bars, locking them into place. The exceptional ductility of the
steel to resist tensile forces, coupled with the rock-like ability of concrete to resist compression, results in an excellent combination of the
three most important earthquake resistance properties: stiffness, strength, and ductility. A study at Construction Technology Laboratories
revealed that even a lightly reinforced concrete shear wall has over six times the racking load resistance as framed wall
construction.
|
It’s no wonder that modern reinforced concrete buildings were found to survive these recent earthquakes with
rarely any significant damage
|
|
*This entire page is from Portland Cement Association's Concrete Homes Technology Brief
10.
|
|
|